<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buying a Cessna 172 (part 2 of 5)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/</link>
	<description>Because A Good Pilot Is Always Learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cavecpl513</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-6464</link>
		<dc:creator>Cavecpl513</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-6464</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t find, &quot;Buying a Cessna 172&quot; Part 1!   Where might it be located?
 Thank You, for Your Time.        -Thom&quot;Caveman&quot; Altman (subscriber)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t find, &#8220;Buying a Cessna 172&#8243; Part 1!   Where might it be located?<br />
 Thank You, for Your Time.        -Thom&#8221;Caveman&#8221; Altman (subscriber)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-6144</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-6144</guid>
		<description>Hey Jason, love ya stuff man.  I am 59 years old and just now looking to get my license and first plane.  I want to end up in a twin.   First of all , am I just to damn old to start flying now, and do I have to start in a single, or can I just go out and purchase that Baron and learn in that?  Silly questions maybe, but i just need to know.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jason, love ya stuff man.  I am 59 years old and just now looking to get my license and first plane.  I want to end up in a twin.   First of all , am I just to damn old to start flying now, and do I have to start in a single, or can I just go out and purchase that Baron and learn in that?  Silly questions maybe, but i just need to know.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: List Pay Day Pro 2</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5017</link>
		<dc:creator>List Pay Day Pro 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-5017</guid>
		<description>Awesome info here, I am also looking into buying my first plane!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome info here, I am also looking into buying my first plane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choosing an Aircraft &#124; aircraftenthusiast</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator>Choosing an Aircraft &#124; aircraftenthusiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 23:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-4981</guid>
		<description>[...] If you decide on a Cessna 172, read more about it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you decide on a Cessna 172, read more about it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mzeroa</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator>mzeroa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 04:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3087</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;172&#039;s are frequent trainers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Things to look for&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Low Total time airframe (TTAF) under say 4,000 is a gem but don&#039;t overlook the 5-6 thousand range&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Low overhaul time (SMOH) Most 172&#039;s have a lycoming 0-320 and the overhaul &quot;max suggestion time&quot; is 2000 hours. Look for something midlife or less.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-IFR avionics. DO you wish to get you instrument one day? This will save a ton of money and stress having them installed already.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s a ton more email me and keep me up to date on your progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike,</p>
<p>172&#39;s are frequent trainers.</p>
<p>Things to look for</p>
<p>-Low Total time airframe (TTAF) under say 4,000 is a gem but don&#39;t overlook the 5-6 thousand range</p>
<p>-Low overhaul time (SMOH) Most 172&#39;s have a lycoming 0-320 and the overhaul &#8220;max suggestion time&#8221; is 2000 hours. Look for something midlife or less.</p>
<p>-IFR avionics. DO you wish to get you instrument one day? This will save a ton of money and stress having them installed already.</p>
<p>There&#39;s a ton more email me and keep me up to date on your progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 03:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>Looking for my 1st plane, I would like to take lessons and purchase the same type of plane, any advise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for my 1st plane, I would like to take lessons and purchase the same type of plane, any advise.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>Jason, nice overview, but I&#039;m afraid that you&#039;re poorly informed on at least a few points...

1) the 172S is a 180hp, 2550 lb mtow version of the 172R (160hp, 2440 mtow).

2) the six pack instrument panel predates the 1973 172M by at least two years, as my 1971 AA-1A has a six pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, nice overview, but I&#8217;m afraid that you&#8217;re poorly informed on at least a few points&#8230;</p>
<p>1) the 172S is a 180hp, 2550 lb mtow version of the 172R (160hp, 2440 mtow).</p>
<p>2) the six pack instrument panel predates the 1973 172M by at least two years, as my 1971 AA-1A has a six pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3584</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3584</guid>
		<description>Jason, nice overview, but I&#039;m afraid that you&#039;re poorly informed on at least a few points...

1) the 172S is a 180hp, 2550 lb mtow version of the 172R (160hp, 2440 mtow).

2) the six pack instrument panel predates the 1973 172M by at least two years, as my 1971 AA-1A has a six pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, nice overview, but I&#8217;m afraid that you&#8217;re poorly informed on at least a few points&#8230;</p>
<p>1) the 172S is a 180hp, 2550 lb mtow version of the 172R (160hp, 2440 mtow).</p>
<p>2) the six pack instrument panel predates the 1973 172M by at least two years, as my 1971 AA-1A has a six pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3585</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3585</guid>
		<description>Jason, nice overview, but I&#039;m afraid that you&#039;re poorly informed on at least a few points...

1) the 172S is a 180hp, 2550 lb mtow version of the 172R (160hp, 2440 mtow).

2) the six pack instrument panel predates the 1973 172M by at least two years, as my 1971 AA-1A has a six pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, nice overview, but I&#8217;m afraid that you&#8217;re poorly informed on at least a few points&#8230;</p>
<p>1) the 172S is a 180hp, 2550 lb mtow version of the 172R (160hp, 2440 mtow).</p>
<p>2) the six pack instrument panel predates the 1973 172M by at least two years, as my 1971 AA-1A has a six pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>Jason, nice overview, but I&#039;m afraid that you&#039;re poorly informed on at least a few points...

1) the 172S is a 180hp, 2550 lb mtow version of the 172R (160hp, 2440 mtow).

2) the six pack instrument panel predates the 1973 172M by at least two years, as my 1971 AA-1A has a six pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, nice overview, but I&#8217;m afraid that you&#8217;re poorly informed on at least a few points&#8230;</p>
<p>1) the 172S is a 180hp, 2550 lb mtow version of the 172R (160hp, 2440 mtow).</p>
<p>2) the six pack instrument panel predates the 1973 172M by at least two years, as my 1971 AA-1A has a six pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Schappert</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Schappert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-2499</guid>
		<description>Ira,

Great question!

In 1971 Cessna introduced the 172L. The biggest change in this was the landing gear from a flat tapered steel spring (no camber) to tubular landing gear.

-Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ira,</p>
<p>Great question!</p>
<p>In 1971 Cessna introduced the 172L. The biggest change in this was the landing gear from a flat tapered steel spring (no camber) to tubular landing gear.</p>
<p>-Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Schappert</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Schappert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3581</guid>
		<description>Ira,

Great question!

In 1971 Cessna introduced the 172L. The biggest change in this was the landing gear from a flat tapered steel spring (no camber) to tubular landing gear.

-Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ira,</p>
<p>Great question!</p>
<p>In 1971 Cessna introduced the 172L. The biggest change in this was the landing gear from a flat tapered steel spring (no camber) to tubular landing gear.</p>
<p>-Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Schappert</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Schappert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>Ira,

Great question!

In 1971 Cessna introduced the 172L. The biggest change in this was the landing gear from a flat tapered steel spring (no camber) to tubular landing gear.

-Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ira,</p>
<p>Great question!</p>
<p>In 1971 Cessna introduced the 172L. The biggest change in this was the landing gear from a flat tapered steel spring (no camber) to tubular landing gear.</p>
<p>-Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Schappert</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3583</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Schappert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3583</guid>
		<description>Ira,

Great question!

In 1971 Cessna introduced the 172L. The biggest change in this was the landing gear from a flat tapered steel spring (no camber) to tubular landing gear.

-Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ira,</p>
<p>Great question!</p>
<p>In 1971 Cessna introduced the 172L. The biggest change in this was the landing gear from a flat tapered steel spring (no camber) to tubular landing gear.</p>
<p>-Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>1977 C-172N
Can the landing gear exhibit negative camber or does this mean the gear is sprung?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1977 C-172N<br />
Can the landing gear exhibit negative camber or does this mean the gear is sprung?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3578</guid>
		<description>1977 C-172N
Can the landing gear exhibit negative camber or does this mean the gear is sprung?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1977 C-172N<br />
Can the landing gear exhibit negative camber or does this mean the gear is sprung?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>1977 C-172N
Can the landing gear exhibit negative camber or does this mean the gear is sprung?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1977 C-172N<br />
Can the landing gear exhibit negative camber or does this mean the gear is sprung?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira</title>
		<link>http://www.m0a.com/buying-a-cessna-172-part-2-of-5/comment-page-1/#comment-3580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m0a.com/?p=380#comment-3580</guid>
		<description>1977 C-172N
Can the landing gear exhibit negative camber or does this mean the gear is sprung?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1977 C-172N<br />
Can the landing gear exhibit negative camber or does this mean the gear is sprung?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

